Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs SCHX: how they differ

FDVV and SCHX hold 37% of their weight in the same names.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and SCHX hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDVV and SCHX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDVVSCHX
NVIDIA CORP6.86%7.51%
APPLE INC5.70%6.71%
MICROSOFT CORP4.50%4.89%
BROADCOM INC3.50%3.10%
ALPHABET INC2.21%3.24%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO2.58%1.18%
META PLATFORMS INC0.74%2.02%
ELI LILLY and CO0.56%1.28%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION1.78%0.50%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON0.49%0.80%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO1.81%0.49%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC0.47%0.51%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in SCHX
ORKLA ASA 1.37%Amazon.com Inc 3.87%
VAIL RESORTS INC 1.27%Alphabet Inc 2.58%
BANCA MONTE DEI PASCHI DI SIENA SPA 1.26%Tesla Inc 1.79%
DANSKE BANK A/S 1.24%Micron Technology Inc 1.60%
BANCO BPM SPA 1.18%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.27%
STELLANTIS NV 0.96%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.23%
WHIRLPOOL CORP 0.87%Exxon Mobil Corp 0.89%
ACCENTURE PLC 0.73%Visa Inc 0.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FDVV and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelitySchwab
What it isHigh DividendU.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+16.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−0.7 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%94.9%
Holdings96748

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

SCHX in plain words

SCHX is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 748 positions, with the top ten at 37.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or SCHX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and SCHX returned +16.8%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or SCHX?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and SCHX charges 0.03%, so SCHX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 95% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 37% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against SCHX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against SCHX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-SCHX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources