Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs SCHG: how they differ

FDVV and SCHG hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and SCHG hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDVV and SCHG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDVVSCHG
NVIDIA CORP6.86%11.02%
APPLE INC5.70%9.84%
MICROSOFT CORP4.50%7.18%
BROADCOM INC3.50%4.55%
ALPHABET INC2.21%4.76%
META PLATFORMS INC0.74%3.46%
ELI LILLY and CO0.56%3.06%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC0.47%1.20%
GE AEROSPACE0.34%1.19%
WALT DISNEY CO/THE0.13%0.63%
T-MOBILE US INC0.08%0.31%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVVOnly in SCHG
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%Amazon.com Inc 5.68%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%Tesla Inc 3.92%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%Alphabet Inc 3.78%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.94%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.71%Visa Inc 1.92%
ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70%Costco Wholesale Corp 1.48%
HOME DEPOT INC 1.66%Mastercard Inc 1.41%
STARBUCKS CORP 1.66%Netflix Inc 1.27%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FDVV and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerFidelitySchwab
What it isHigh DividendU.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.2%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.3 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50086.7%95.4%
Holdings96193

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or SCHG?
FDVV charges 0.15% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDVV and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources