Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and PULS returned +4.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FDVV or PULS?

FDVV charges 0.15% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs PULS: how they differ

FDVV and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVV	Only in PULS
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
APPLE INC 5.70%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

FDVV and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	PGIM
What it is	High Dividend	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.2%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.3 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.15%
Holdings	96	553

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and PULS returned +4.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or PULS?: FDVV charges 0.15% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources