Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and MUB returned +0.1%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FDVV or MUB?

FDVV charges 0.15% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs MUB: how they differ

FDVV and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVV	Only in MUB
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
APPLE INC 5.70%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

FDVV and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	iShares
What it is	High Dividend	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.2%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.3 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.05%
Holdings	96	6603

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and MUB returned +0.1%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or MUB?: FDVV charges 0.15% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources