Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs MAGS: how they differ
FDVV and MAGS hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and MAGS hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDVV | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 6.86% | 4.15% |
| APPLE INC | 5.70% | 4.12% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 4.50% | 3.62% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.21% | 2.89% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 0.74% | 3.59% |
| Only in FDVV | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| BROADCOM INC 3.50% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| COCA COLA CO 1.85% | Amazon.com Inc 4.11% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | Tesla Inc 4.07% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78% | |
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.71% | |
| ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70% | |
| HOME DEPOT INC 1.66% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | Roundhill |
| What it is | High Dividend | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 96 | 9 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or MAGS?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 15% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources