Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or JNK?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and JNK returned +3.3%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, FDVV or JNK?

FDVV charges 0.15% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

FDVV vs JNK: how they differ

FDVV and JNK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Fidelity High Dividend ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and JNK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in FDVV	Only in JNK
NVIDIA CORP 6.86%	1261229 BC LTD 0.64%
APPLE INC 5.70%	MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 0.58%
MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%	ECHOSTAR CORP 0.52%
BROADCOM INC 3.50%	PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.49%
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%	CLOUD SOFTWARE GRP INC 0.42%
ALPHABET INC 2.21%	QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC 0.41%
COCA COLA CO 1.85%	DISH NETWORK CORP 0.41%
PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%	SV RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 0.40%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

FDVV and JNK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF	JNK State Street(R) SPDR(R) Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Fidelity	State Street
What it is	High Dividend	SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.2%	+3.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.3 pts	−14.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.40%
Holdings	96	1198

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

JNK in plain words

JNK is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or JNK?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and JNK returned +3.3%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, FDVV or JNK?: FDVV charges 0.15% a year and JNK charges 0.40%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDVV against JNK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against JNK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-JNK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources