Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs IGM: how they differ
FDVV and IGM hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and IGM hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FDVV | IGM |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 6.86% | 7.97% |
| APPLE INC | 5.70% | 7.92% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 4.50% | 7.50% |
| BROADCOM INC | 3.50% | 7.61% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.21% | 4.45% |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. | 1.32% | 1.18% |
| IBM CORPORATION | 0.90% | 1.15% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 0.74% | 4.17% |
| DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.44% | 0.55% |
| HP INC | 0.86% | 0.09% |
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC | 0.05% | 0.20% |
| SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC | 0.96% | 0.04% |
| Only in FDVV | Only in IGM |
|---|---|
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47% |
| COCA COLA CO 1.85% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | Alphabet, Inc. 3.55% |
| BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.78% | Intel Corp. 2.88% |
| GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.71% | Applied Materials, Inc. 2.50% |
| ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70% | Lam Research Corp. 2.37% |
| HOME DEPOT INC 1.66% | Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02% |
| STARBUCKS CORP 1.66% | KLA Corp. 1.72% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | High Dividend | Expanded Tech Sector |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | +32.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | +15.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.37% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 92.0% |
| Holdings | 96 | 295 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
IGM in plain words
IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or IGM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or IGM?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and IGM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 92% of IGM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against IGM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-IGM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources