Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
FDVV vs FXI: how they differ
FDVV and FXI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.
Fidelity High Dividend ETF and iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in FDVV | Only in FXI |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 6.86% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66% |
| APPLE INC 5.70% | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 4.50% | Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72% |
| BROADCOM INC 3.50% | INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58% | XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41% |
| ALPHABET INC 2.21% | MEITUAN 4.79% |
| COCA COLA CO 1.85% | Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41% |
| PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81% | BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF | FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | High Dividend | China Large-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.2% | −13.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.3 pts | −31.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.73% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 86.7% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 96 | 52 |
FDVV in plain words
FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.
FXI in plain words
FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or FXI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +17.2% and FXI returned −13.8%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or FXI?
- FDVV charges 0.15% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do FDVV and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of FDVV and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDVV against FXI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/FDVV-FXI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources