Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EZU vs VEA: how they differ

EZU and VEA hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and VEA returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EZU and VEA hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EZU and VEA both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEZUVEA
Allianz SE2.18%0.56%
Siemens Energy AG1.89%0.45%
Infineon Technologies AG1.60%0.38%
Deutsche Telekom AG1.59%0.29%
AXA SA0.99%0.25%
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellscha0.89%0.22%
Nokia Oyj1.00%0.21%
Nordea Bank Abp0.76%0.19%
Deutsche Post AG0.71%0.17%
E.ON SE0.61%0.14%
Mercedes-Benz Group AG0.57%0.12%
Erste Group Bank AG0.47%0.12%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EZUOnly in VEA
ASML Holding N.V. 8.10%ASML Holding NV 2.37%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 3.08%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 1.56%
SAP SE 2.44%SK hynix Inc 1.40%
Banco Santander, S.A. 2.37%HSBC Holdings PLC 1.01%
TOTALENERGIES SE 2.25%Novartis AG 0.91%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE 2.22%Royal Bank of Canada 0.90%
Iberdrola, S.A. 1.89%AstraZeneca PLC 0.87%
LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON SE 1.76%Nestle SA 0.82%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EZU and VEA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EZU
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
VEA
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isMSCI EurozoneDeveloped markets ex US
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.5 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.50%0.03%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.0%
Holdings2263870

EZU in plain words

EZU is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 226 positions, with the top ten at 28.2%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VEA in plain words

VEA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3870 positions, with the top ten at 13.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EZU or VEA?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +18.0% and VEA returned +24.5%, so VEA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EZU or VEA?
EZU charges 0.50% a year and VEA charges 0.03%, so VEA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EZU and VEA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EZU and 0% of VEA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EZU against VEA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EZU against VEA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EZU-VEA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources