Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EZU vs SCHG: how they differ
EZU and SCHG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EZU returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EZU and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EZU | Only in SCHG |
|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. 8.10% | NVIDIA Corp 11.02% |
| Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 3.08% | Apple Inc 9.84% |
| SAP SE 2.44% | Microsoft Corp 7.18% |
| Banco Santander, S.A. 2.37% | Amazon.com Inc 5.68% |
| TOTALENERGIES SE 2.25% | Alphabet Inc 4.76% |
| SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE 2.22% | Broadcom Inc 4.55% |
| Allianz SE 2.18% | Tesla Inc 3.92% |
| Siemens Energy AG 1.89% | Alphabet Inc 3.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Schwab |
| What it is | MSCI Eurozone | U.S. Large-Cap Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.0% | +12.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +0.5 pts | −4.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 95.4% |
| Holdings | 226 | 193 |
EZU in plain words
EZU is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 226 positions, with the top ten at 28.2%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
SCHG in plain words
SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EZU or SCHG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +18.0% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so EZU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EZU or SCHG?
- EZU charges 0.50% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EZU and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EZU and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EZU against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EZU-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources