Which returned more over the last year, EZU or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +18.0% and MUB returned +0.1%, so EZU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EZU or MUB?

EZU charges 0.50% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EZU vs MUB: how they differ

EZU and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EZU returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EZU and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EZU	Only in MUB
ASML Holding N.V. 8.10%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 3.08%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
SAP SE 2.44%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
Banco Santander, S.A. 2.37%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
TOTALENERGIES SE 2.25%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE 2.22%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
Allianz SE 2.18%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
Siemens Energy AG 1.89%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

EZU and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	MSCI Eurozone	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	+18.0%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+0.5 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.50%	0.05%
Holdings	226	6603

EZU in plain words

EZU is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 226 positions, with the top ten at 28.2%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EZU or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EZU returned +18.0% and MUB returned +0.1%, so EZU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EZU or MUB?: EZU charges 0.50% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EZU against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EZU against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EZU-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources