Which returned more over the last year, EWZ or SCHP?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWZ returned +32.9% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so EWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWZ or SCHP?

EWZ charges 0.59% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWZ vs SCHP: how they differ

EWZ and SCHP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWZ returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Brazil ETF and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWZ and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWZ	Only in SCHP
VALE S.A. 11.62%	United States Treasury 4.09%
Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.80%	United States Treasury 4.03%
Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 8.57%	United States Treasury 4.02%
Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 6.77%	United States Treasury 3.79%
B3 S.A - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcao 3.61%	United States Treasury 3.62%
AMBEV S.A. 3.23%	United States Treasury 3.42%
WEG S.A. 3.08%	United States Treasury 3.39%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado 2.90%	United States Treasury 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EWZ and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF	SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	MSCI Brazil	US TIPS
Total return, 1 year	+32.9%	−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+15.4 pts	−18.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.03%
Holdings	47	48

EWZ in plain words

EWZ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Brazil. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHP in plain words

SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWZ or SCHP?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWZ returned +32.9% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so EWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWZ or SCHP?: EWZ charges 0.59% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWZ against SCHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWZ against SCHP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWZ-SCHP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources