Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EWT vs XLV: how they differ
EWT and XLV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and XLV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EWT | Only in XLV |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 19.35% | Eli Lilly & Co 16.56% |
| MediaTek Inc. 7.56% | Johnson & Johnson 10.67% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 5.64% | AbbVie Inc 7.76% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 4.09% | UnitedHealth Group Inc 6.59% |
| ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. 2.86% | Merck & Co Inc 5.54% |
| ELITE MATERIAL CO., LTD. 2.75% | Amgen Inc 3.41% |
| UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2.73% | Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 3.25% |
| United Microelectronics Corporation 2.25% | Abbott Laboratories 2.76% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | XLV State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | MSCI Taiwan | Health care |
| Total return, 1 year | +84.9% | +20.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +67.4 pts | +2.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 85 | 59 |
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.
XLV in plain words
XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or XLV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and XLV returned +20.4%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or XLV?
- EWT charges 0.59% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EWT and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWT-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources