Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EWT vs XLG: how they differ
EWT and XLG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EWT | Only in XLG |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 19.35% | NVIDIA Corp. 13.10% |
| MediaTek Inc. 7.56% | Apple Inc. 10.76% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 5.64% | Microsoft Corp. 8.18% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 4.09% | Amazon.com, Inc. 6.99% |
| ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. 2.86% | Alphabet Inc. 6.05% |
| ELITE MATERIAL CO., LTD. 2.75% | Broadcom Inc. 4.85% |
| UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2.73% | Alphabet Inc. 4.82% |
| United Microelectronics Corporation 2.25% | Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | MSCI Taiwan | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | +84.9% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +67.4 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 85 | 51 |
EWT in plain words
EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and XLG returned +12.2%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or XLG?
- EWT charges 0.59% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so XLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EWT and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWT and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWT-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources