Which returned more over the last year, EWT or VCLT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWT or VCLT?

EWT charges 0.59% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWT vs VCLT: how they differ

EWT and VCLT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWT	Only in VCLT
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 19.35%	Anheuser-Busch Cos LLC / Anheuser-Busch 0.38%
MediaTek Inc. 7.56%	CVS Health Corp 0.34%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 5.64%	Meta Platforms Inc 0.29%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 4.09%	Boeing Co/The 0.27%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. 2.86%	Pfizer Investment Enterprises Pte Ltd 0.27%
ELITE MATERIAL CO., LTD. 2.75%	Amazon.com Inc 0.26%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2.73%	Oracle Corp 0.24%
United Microelectronics Corporation 2.25%	AT&T Inc 0.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

EWT and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	VCLT Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	MSCI Taiwan	Long-Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+84.9%	−4.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+67.4 pts	−22.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.03%
Holdings	85	2775

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.

VCLT in plain words

VCLT is a bond fund tracking the Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 18.1% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or VCLT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and VCLT returned −4.8%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWT or VCLT?: EWT charges 0.59% a year and VCLT charges 0.03%, so VCLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWT against VCLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against VCLT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWT-VCLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources