Which returned more over the last year, EWT or SPSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and SPSB returned +2.5%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EWT or SPSB?

EWT charges 0.59% a year and SPSB charges 0.04%, so SPSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EWT vs SPSB: how they differ

EWT and SPSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWT returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EWT and SPSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EWT	Only in SPSB
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 19.35%	SALESFORCE INC 0.59%
MediaTek Inc. 7.56%	AERCAP IRELAND CAP/GLOBA 0.46%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 5.64%	BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.44%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 4.09%	CITIGROUP INC 0.44%
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. 2.86%	MORGAN STANLEY 0.40%
ELITE MATERIAL CO., LTD. 2.75%	JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 0.39%
UNIMICRON TECHNOLOGY CORP. 2.73%	PFIZER INVESTMENT ENTER 0.39%
United Microelectronics Corporation 2.25%	SPRINT CAPITAL CORP 0.39%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EWT and SPSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF	SPSB State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	MSCI Taiwan	SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+84.9%	+2.5%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+67.4 pts	−15.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.59%	0.04%
Holdings	85	1599

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.

SPSB in plain words

SPSB is a bond fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio Short Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWT or SPSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +84.9% and SPSB returned +2.5%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EWT or SPSB?: EWT charges 0.59% a year and SPSB charges 0.04%, so SPSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EWT against SPSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EWT against SPSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EWT-SPSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources