Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EMXC vs VT: how they differ
EMXC and VT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and VT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EMXC | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0.44% | 0.04% |
| CREDICORP LTD. | 0.23% | 0.02% |
| America Movil, S.A.B. de C.V. | 0.23% | 0.02% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION | 0.17% | 0.01% |
| Global Unichip Corp | 0.12% | 0.01% |
| Piraeus Bank SA | 0.11% | 0.01% |
| Alteogen Inc | 0.10% | 0.01% |
| Abu Dhabi Islamic Bank PJSC | 0.08% | 0.01% |
| Divi's Laboratories Ltd | 0.08% | 0.01% |
| SASOL LIMITED | 0.07% | 0.01% |
| eMemory Technology Inc | 0.07% | 0.01% |
| Banco de Chile | 0.09% | 0.01% |
| Only in EMXC | Only in VT |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 17.97% | NVIDIA Corp 4.22% |
| SK hynix Inc. 8.37% | Apple Inc 3.53% |
| MediaTek Inc. 2.04% | Microsoft Corp 2.73% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.47% | Amazon.com Inc 2.29% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 1.13% | Alphabet Inc 2.04% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 1.07% | Broadcom Inc 1.74% |
| HDFC BANK LIMITED 0.88% | Alphabet Inc 1.61% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0.83% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | VT Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China | Total World Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +55.5% | +18.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +38.0 pts | +1.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.06% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 55.2% |
| Holdings | 662 | 10042 |
EMXC in plain words
EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 662 positions, with the top ten at 44.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VT in plain words
VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or VT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +55.5% and VT returned +18.9%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EMXC or VT?
- EMXC charges 0.25% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EMXC and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMXC against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMXC-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources