Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +55.5% and PULS returned +4.2%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMXC or PULS?

EMXC charges 0.25% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMXC vs PULS: how they differ

EMXC and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMXC	Only in PULS
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 17.97%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
SK hynix Inc. 8.37%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
MediaTek Inc. 2.04%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.47%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 1.13%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 1.07%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
HDFC BANK LIMITED 0.88%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0.83%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EMXC and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	PGIM
What it is	MSCI Emerging Markets ex China	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+55.5%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+38.0 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.25%	0.15%
Holdings	662	553

EMXC in plain words

EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 662 positions, with the top ten at 44.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +55.5% and PULS returned +4.2%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMXC or PULS?: EMXC charges 0.25% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMXC against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMXC against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMXC-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources