Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EMXC vs IWF: how they differ
EMXC and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EMXC | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Nu Holdings Ltd. | 0.44% | 0.14% |
| SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION | 0.17% | 0.01% |
| Only in EMXC | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 17.97% | NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85% |
| SK hynix Inc. 8.37% | APPLE INC. 6.72% |
| MediaTek Inc. 2.04% | ALPHABET INC. 6.18% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.47% | BROADCOM INC. 5.21% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 1.13% | ALPHABET INC. 4.98% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 1.07% | MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11% |
| HDFC BANK LIMITED 0.88% | MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0.83% | TESLA, INC. 3.65% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +55.5% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +38.0 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 662 | 368 |
EMXC in plain words
EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 662 positions, with the top ten at 44.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +55.5% and IWF returned +7.0%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EMXC or IWF?
- EMXC charges 0.25% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so IWF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EMXC and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMXC against IWF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMXC-IWF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources