Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
EMXC vs FXI: how they differ
EMXC and FXI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMXC returned more over the year.
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF and iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EMXC and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | EMXC | FXI |
|---|---|---|
| EURO | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Only in EMXC | Only in FXI |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 17.97% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66% |
| SK hynix Inc. 8.37% | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25% |
| MediaTek Inc. 2.04% | Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72% |
| DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.47% | INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02% |
| HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 1.13% | XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 1.07% | MEITUAN 4.79% |
| HDFC BANK LIMITED 0.88% | Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41% |
| RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED 0.83% | BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China | China Large-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +55.5% | −13.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +38.0 pts | −31.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.73% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 662 | 52 |
EMXC in plain words
EMXC is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +55.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 662 positions, with the top ten at 44.3%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
FXI in plain words
FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMXC or FXI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMXC returned +55.5% and FXI returned −13.8%, so EMXC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, EMXC or FXI?
- EMXC charges 0.25% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so EMXC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do EMXC and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EMXC and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMXC against FXI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMXC-FXI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources