Which returned more over the last year, EMB or VB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or VB?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs VB: how they differ

EMB and VB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VB returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and VB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in VB
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	Jabil Inc 0.49%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	Astera Labs Inc 0.45%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	Natera Inc 0.45%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	Twilio Inc 0.38%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	NRG Energy Inc 0.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

EMB and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	VB Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Vanguard
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Small-Cap
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−2.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.03%
Holdings	681	1311

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or VB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and VB returned +15.2%, so VB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or VB?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources