Which returned more over the last year, EMB or USMV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and USMV returned +6.6%, so USMV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or USMV?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so USMV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs USMV: how they differ

EMB and USMV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and USMV returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and USMV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in USMV
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.81%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	NVIDIA CORPORATION 1.64%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 1.60%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	MICROSOFT CORPORATION 1.56%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION 1.55%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	THE SOUTHERN COMPANY 1.53%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	AMPHENOL CORPORATION 1.51%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	Chubb Limited 1.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

EMB and USMV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	MSCI USA Min Vol Factor
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+6.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−10.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.15%
Holdings	681	170

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

USMV in plain words

USMV is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Min Vol Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 15.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or USMV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and USMV returned +6.6%, so USMV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or USMV?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and USMV charges 0.15%, so USMV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against USMV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against USMV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-USMV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources