Which returned more over the last year, EMB or QQQ?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and QQQ returned +23.0%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or QQQ?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs QQQ: how they differ

EMB and QQQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and QQQ returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and QQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in QQQ
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	NVIDIA Corp. 8.16%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	Apple Inc. 7.29%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	Microsoft Corp. 5.32%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	Alphabet Inc. 3.52%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	Tesla, Inc. 3.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

EMB and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Invesco
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+23.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+5.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.18%
Holdings	681	101

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or QQQ?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and QQQ returned +23.0%, so QQQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or QQQ?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against QQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against QQQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-QQQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources