Which returned more over the last year, EMB or LQD?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or LQD?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs LQD: how they differ

EMB and LQD are both bond index funds, and over the year EMB returned more, +2.8% against −2.7%.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

EMB and LQD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	US investment grade bonds
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	−2.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−20.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.14%
Holdings	681	not filed

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

LQD in plain words

LQD is a bond fund tracking the US investment grade bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −2.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.14% a year. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or LQD?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and LQD returned −2.7%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or LQD?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and LQD charges 0.14%, so LQD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against LQD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against LQD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-LQD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources