Which returned more over the last year, EMB or JAAA?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and JAAA returned +4.9%, so JAAA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or JAAA?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and JAAA charges 0.20%, so JAAA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs JAAA: how they differ

EMB and JAAA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and JAAA returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and JAAA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in JAAA
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	KKR CLO 35 Ltd. 0.96%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	AB BSL CLO 1 Ltd. 0.88%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	Anchorage Capital CLO 16 Ltd. 0.82%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	Anchorage Capital CLO 17 Ltd. 0.80%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	Carlyle US CLO Ltd. 0.70%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	Carlyle US CLO Ltd. 0.67%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	Regatta XIX Funding Ltd. 0.67%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	Magnetite XXXII Ltd. 0.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

EMB and JAAA on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Janus
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Henderson AAA CLO
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+4.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−12.6 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.20%
Holdings	681	600

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

JAAA in plain words

JAAA is an index equity fund tracking the Henderson AAA CLO. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 600 positions, with the top ten at 7.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or JAAA?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and JAAA returned +4.9%, so JAAA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or JAAA?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and JAAA charges 0.20%, so JAAA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against JAAA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against JAAA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-JAAA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources