Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IJR?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and IJR returned +19.9%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or IJR?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and IJR charges 0.06%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs IJR: how they differ

EMB and IJR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJR returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and IJR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in IJR
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	FORMFACTOR INC 0.69%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	VIASAT INC 0.68%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 0.66%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	ARGAN INC 0.62%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.61%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	ELEMENT SOLUTIONS INC 0.61%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	MAXLINEAR INC 0.60%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC 0.54%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

EMB and IJR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	S&P SmallCap 600
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+19.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+2.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.06%
Holdings	681	603

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

IJR in plain words

IJR is an index equity fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +19.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 603 positions, with the top ten at 6.0%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IJR?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and IJR returned +19.9%, so IJR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or IJR?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and IJR charges 0.06%, so IJR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against IJR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against IJR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-IJR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources