Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IJH?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and IJH returned +13.4%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or IJH?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs IJH: how they differ

EMB and IJH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJH returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and IJH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in IJH
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	TWILIO INC 0.86%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	MKS INC 0.83%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	ATI INC 0.74%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	ILLUMINA INC 0.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

EMB and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	S&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+13.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−4.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.05%
Holdings	681	400

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IJH?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and IJH returned +13.4%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or IJH?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against IJH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against IJH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-IJH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources