Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IGM?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or IGM?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so IGM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs IGM: how they differ

EMB and IGM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IGM returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and IGM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in IGM
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	NVIDIA Corp. 7.97%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	Apple, Inc. 7.92%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	Broadcom, Inc. 7.61%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	Microsoft Corp. 7.50%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	Micron Technology, Inc. 5.47%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	Alphabet, Inc. 4.45%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	Meta Platforms, Inc. 4.17%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

EMB and IGM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Expanded Tech Sector
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+32.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+15.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.37%
Holdings	681	295

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

IGM in plain words

IGM is an index equity fund tracking the Expanded Tech Sector. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 295 positions, with the top ten at 55.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or IGM?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and IGM returned +32.7%, so IGM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or IGM?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and IGM charges 0.37%, so IGM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against IGM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against IGM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-IGM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources