Which returned more over the last year, EMB or GRNY?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so GRNY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or GRNY?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so EMB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs GRNY: how they differ

EMB and GRNY hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and GRNY returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and GRNY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in GRNY
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	Quanta Services Inc 3.20%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	GE Vernova Inc 3.05%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	Amazon.com Inc 3.02%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	Strategy Inc 3.01%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	Alphabet Inc 2.96%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	Broadcom Inc 2.94%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	Arista Networks Inc 2.88%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

EMB and GRNY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Fundstrat
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−3.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.75%
Holdings	681	40

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

GRNY in plain words

GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or GRNY?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so GRNY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or GRNY?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so EMB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against GRNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources