Which returned more over the last year, EMB or FDVV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and FDVV returned +17.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or FDVV?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and FDVV charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs FDVV: how they differ

EMB and FDVV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Fidelity High Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and FDVV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in FDVV
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 1.12%	NVIDIA CORP 6.86%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.73%	APPLE INC 5.70%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.64%	MICROSOFT CORP 4.50%
Argentina Republic Government Internatio 0.53%	BROADCOM INC 3.50%
Uruguay Government International Bonds 0.52%	JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.51%	ALPHABET INC 2.21%
Republic of Poland Government Internatio 0.40%	COCA COLA CO 1.85%
UKRAINE GOVERNMENT 0.38%	PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

EMB and FDVV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Fidelity
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	High Dividend
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	−0.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.15%
Holdings	681	96

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or FDVV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and FDVV returned +17.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or FDVV?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and FDVV charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against FDVV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against FDVV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EMB-FDVV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources