Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EFA vs VYMI: how they differ

EFA and VYMI hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and VYMI returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EFA and VYMI hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EFA and VYMI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEFAVYMI
Allianz SE0.81%0.95%
UBS Group AG0.65%0.77%
Deutsche Telekom AG0.55%0.60%
GSK PLC0.49%0.57%
Zurich Insurance Group AG0.47%0.58%
AXA SA0.37%0.42%
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellscha0.36%0.43%
Nordea Bank Abp0.27%0.33%
Aktiebolaget Volvo0.26%0.30%
Deutsche Post AG0.25%0.30%
E.ON SE0.23%0.27%
Swiss Re AG0.22%0.26%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EFAOnly in VYMI
ASML Holding N.V. 2.60%HSBC Holdings PLC 1.73%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.47%Novartis AG 1.56%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.36%Nestle SA 1.44%
Novartis AG 1.30%Shell PLC 1.43%
Nestle S.A. 1.21%Royal Bank of Canada 1.38%
SHELL PLC 1.20%Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.15%
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 1.05%Toyota Motor Corp 1.12%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.98%Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.08%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

EFA and VYMI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
VYMI
Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isDeveloped markets ex USInternational High Dividend Yield
Total return, 1 year+18.2%+28.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.7 pts+10.7 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.07%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%0.1%
Holdings7051582

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 705 positions, with the top ten at 13.4%.

VYMI in plain words

VYMI is an index equity fund tracking the International High Dividend Yield. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1582 positions, with the top ten at 13.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or VYMI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and VYMI returned +28.2%, so VYMI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EFA or VYMI?
EFA charges 0.32% a year and VYMI charges 0.07%, so VYMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EFA and VYMI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFA and 0% of VYMI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EFA against VYMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against VYMI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/EFA-VYMI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources