Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs XLV: how they differ

DYNF and XLV hold 6% of their weight in the same names.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and XLV hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and XLV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFXLV
Johnson & Johnson1.92%10.67%
Eli Lilly & Co0.89%16.56%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.48%3.25%
Gilead Sciences Inc0.42%2.74%
Boston Scientific Corp0.41%1.11%
Intuitive Surgical Inc0.32%2.46%
Medtronic PLC0.29%1.75%
AbbVie Inc0.27%7.76%
Pfizer Inc0.24%2.40%
HCA Healthcare Inc0.23%1.06%
Cardinal Health Inc0.20%0.97%
McKesson Corp0.17%1.59%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in XLV
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%Merck & Co Inc 5.54%
Apple Inc 7.75%Amgen Inc 3.41%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%Abbott Laboratories 2.76%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 2.20%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%Danaher Corp 2.10%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.05%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%Stryker Corp 1.90%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%Elevance Health Inc 1.47%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and XLV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
XLV
State Street(R) Health Care Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveHealth care
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+20.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+2.9 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%100.0%
Holdings18759

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

XLV in plain words

XLV is an index equity fund tracking the Health care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 61.7%. It sat 5.9% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or XLV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and XLV returned +20.4%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or XLV?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and XLV charges 0.08%, so XLV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and XLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 100% of XLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against XLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against XLV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-XLV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources