Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs XLP: how they differ

DYNF and XLP hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and XLP hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFXLP
Walmart Inc1.42%10.84%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.46%9.06%
Philip Morris International Inc0.39%6.16%
Dollar General Corp0.10%1.65%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.08%1.91%
Kroger Co/The0.02%2.05%
Dollar Tree Inc0.01%1.43%
Procter & Gamble Co/The0.00%7.46%
Altria Group Inc0.00%4.55%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in XLP
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%Coca-Cola Co/The 6.87%
Apple Inc 7.75%Colgate-Palmolive Co 4.71%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%Monster Beverage Corp 4.47%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%PepsiCo Inc 4.34%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%Mondelez International Inc 4.17%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%Target Corp 3.87%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 2.90%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%Sysco Corp 2.60%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%100.0%
Holdings18734

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or XLP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and XLP returned +6.3%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or XLP?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources