Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs XLK: how they differ
DYNF and XLK hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and XLK returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and XLK hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.62% | 14.66% |
| Apple Inc | 7.75% | 12.86% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.35% | 8.38% |
| Broadcom Inc | 3.25% | 5.41% |
| Lam Research Corp | 2.71% | 3.02% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 2.76% | 2.59% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.41% | 3.20% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.35% | 5.42% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.17% | 1.49% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.14% | 5.28% |
| Amphenol Corp | 0.77% | 1.21% |
| Salesforce Inc | 0.86% | 0.71% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in XLK |
|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% | KLA Corp 2.20% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 1.54% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.87% | Marvell Technology Inc 1.45% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.50% | QUALCOMM Inc 1.09% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38% | Analog Devices Inc 1.08% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.10% | Arista Networks Inc 0.98% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93% | Cadence Design Systems Inc 0.58% |
| Johnson & Johnson 1.92% | Datadog Inc 0.48% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Technology |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +39.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +21.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 187 | 74 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
XLK in plain words
XLK is an index equity fund tracking the Technology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +39.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or XLK?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and XLK returned +39.2%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or XLK?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so XLK is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and XLK overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 100% of XLK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against XLK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-XLK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources