Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs VTI: how they differ

DYNF and VTI hold 55% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VTI hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and VTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFVTI
NVIDIA Corp8.62%6.37%
Apple Inc7.75%5.88%
Microsoft Corp5.35%3.84%
Amazon.com Inc4.42%3.19%
Alphabet Inc2.87%2.90%
Broadcom Inc3.25%2.48%
Alphabet Inc2.10%2.29%
Meta Platforms Inc2.50%1.71%
Tesla Inc1.74%1.64%
Micron Technology Inc1.35%1.80%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.38%1.25%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc1.14%1.31%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in VTI
Eaton Corp PLC 0.75%Mastercard Inc 0.56%
Trane Technologies PLC 0.72%KLA Corp 0.55%
Medtronic PLC 0.29%Merck & Co Inc 0.44%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.24%Chevron Corp 0.43%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.18%Coca-Cola Co/The 0.39%
CRH PLC 0.11%Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.39%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc 0.05%Marvell Technology Inc 0.37%
Millicom International Cellular SA 0.04%Linde PLC 0.33%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and VTI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveUS total market
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%88.3%
Holdings1873531

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

VTI in plain words

VTI is an index equity fund tracking the US total market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3531 positions, with the top ten at 32.1%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VTI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and VTI returned +17.2%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or VTI?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and VTI charges 0.03%, so VTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and VTI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 88% of VTI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 55% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against VTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against VTI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-VTI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources