Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs VT: how they differ

DYNF and VT hold 37% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VT hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and VT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFVT
NVIDIA Corp8.62%4.22%
Apple Inc7.75%3.53%
Microsoft Corp5.35%2.73%
Amazon.com Inc4.42%2.29%
Alphabet Inc2.87%2.04%
Broadcom Inc3.25%1.74%
Alphabet Inc2.10%1.61%
Meta Platforms Inc2.50%1.21%
Tesla Inc1.74%0.97%
JPMorgan Chase & Co3.59%0.72%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.38%0.69%
Eli Lilly & Co0.89%0.68%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in VT
Eaton Corp PLC 0.75%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.52%
Trane Technologies PLC 0.72%Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.64%
Medtronic PLC 0.29%ASML Holding NV 0.51%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.24%SK hynix Inc 0.44%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.18%Mastercard Inc 0.36%
CRH PLC 0.11%Tencent Holdings Ltd 0.34%
Millicom International Cellular SA 0.04%Chevron Corp 0.33%
FTAI Aviation Ltd 0.04%HSBC Holdings PLC 0.28%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DYNF and VT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveTotal World Stock
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+18.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+1.4 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%55.2%
Holdings18710042

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

VT in plain words

VT is an index equity fund tracking the Total World Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 55% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10042 positions, with the top ten at 21.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and VT returned +18.9%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or VT?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and VT charges 0.06%, so VT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and VT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 55% of VT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 37% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against VT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against VT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-VT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources