Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs VOOG: how they differ

DYNF and VOOG hold 59% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VOOG hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and VOOG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFVOOG
NVIDIA Corp8.62%14.29%
Apple Inc7.75%6.38%
Microsoft Corp5.35%9.31%
Amazon.com Inc4.42%3.90%
Broadcom Inc3.25%5.90%
Alphabet Inc2.87%6.17%
Meta Platforms Inc2.50%3.85%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc2.38%2.42%
Alphabet Inc2.10%4.90%
Tesla Inc1.74%2.12%
JPMorgan Chase & Co3.59%1.43%
Micron Technology Inc1.35%3.04%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in VOOG
Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93%Mastercard Inc 0.75%
Duke Energy Corp 1.63%KLA Corp 0.70%
Bank of America Corp 1.59%Arista Networks Inc 0.46%
Hartford Insurance Group Inc/The 1.48%Coca-Cola Co/The 0.36%
Walmart Inc 1.42%Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.35%
Travelers Cos Inc/The 1.35%Amgen Inc 0.34%
Citigroup Inc 1.27%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34%
AT&T Inc 1.03%Quanta Services Inc 0.29%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DYNF and VOOG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
VOOG
Vanguard S&P 500 Growth Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveS&P 500 Growth
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+17.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts+0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%100.0%
Holdings187146

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

VOOG in plain words

VOOG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 146 positions, with the top ten at 60.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VOOG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and VOOG returned +17.8%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or VOOG?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and VOOG charges 0.05%, so VOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and VOOG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 100% of VOOG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 59% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against VOOG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against VOOG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-VOOG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources