Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs VONG: how they differ
DYNF and VONG hold 51% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VONG hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | VONG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.62% | 13.09% |
| Apple Inc | 7.75% | 11.97% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.35% | 8.98% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.42% | 5.07% |
| Broadcom Inc | 3.25% | 5.78% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.87% | 3.91% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.50% | 3.20% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.10% | 3.15% |
| Tesla Inc | 1.74% | 3.48% |
| Lam Research Corp | 2.71% | 1.21% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.14% | 1.47% |
| Netflix Inc | 1.17% | 1.10% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in VONG |
|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | Mastercard Inc 1.20% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 2.76% | KLA Corp 0.76% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.68% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93% | Arista Networks Inc 0.50% |
| Johnson & Johnson 1.92% | Coca-Cola Co/The 0.45% |
| Duke Energy Corp 1.63% | Amgen Inc 0.40% |
| Parker-Hannifin Corp 1.50% | Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 0.34% |
| Hartford Insurance Group Inc/The 1.48% | Adobe Inc 0.32% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Russell 1000 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +7.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −10.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 95.6% |
| Holdings | 187 | 387 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
VONG in plain words
VONG is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 61.3%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VONG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and VONG returned +7.2%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or VONG?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and VONG charges 0.07%, so VONG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and VONG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 96% of VONG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 51% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against VONG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-VONG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources