Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs VLUE: how they differ
DYNF and VLUE hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VLUE hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | VLUE |
|---|---|---|
| Cisco Systems Inc | 2.76% | 4.97% |
| Bank of America Corp | 1.59% | 1.88% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.41% | 3.67% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.35% | 11.63% |
| Citigroup Inc | 1.27% | 1.94% |
| AT&T Inc | 1.03% | 2.53% |
| Verizon Communications Inc | 0.87% | 2.66% |
| Western Digital Corp | 0.56% | 1.89% |
| Capital One Financial Corp | 0.55% | 0.62% |
| Newmont Corp | 0.50% | 0.64% |
| Realty Income Corp | 0.93% | 0.36% |
| American International Group Inc | 0.67% | 0.27% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in VLUE |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 8.62% | QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.80% |
| Apple Inc 7.75% | FEDEX CORPORATION 1.69% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.35% | MERCK & CO., INC. 1.57% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% | FORD MOTOR COMPANY 1.50% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY 1.08% |
| Broadcom Inc 3.25% | NXP Semiconductors N.V. 1.00% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.87% | TE CONNECTIVITY PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.93% |
| Lam Research Corp 2.71% | ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY. 0.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | VLUE iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | MSCI USA Value Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +69.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +51.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 96.9% |
| Holdings | 187 | 148 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
VLUE in plain words
VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VLUE?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or VLUE?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so VLUE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against VLUE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-VLUE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources