Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs VDC: how they differ

DYNF and VDC hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VDC hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and VDC both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFVDC
Walmart Inc1.42%14.76%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.46%12.04%
Philip Morris International Inc0.39%4.66%
Dollar General Corp0.10%0.92%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.08%1.11%
Kroger Co/The0.02%1.39%
Dollar Tree Inc0.01%0.87%
Celsius Holdings Inc0.01%0.29%
Procter & Gamble Co/The0.00%9.27%
Altria Group Inc0.00%3.91%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in VDC
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%Coca-Cola Co/The 8.72%
Apple Inc 7.75%PepsiCo Inc 4.30%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%Mondelez International Inc 2.69%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%Colgate-Palmolive Co 2.37%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%Monster Beverage Corp 2.24%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%Target Corp 2.03%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%Archer-Daniels-Midland Co 1.41%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 1.41%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DYNF and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveConsumer Staples
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+4.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−12.9 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%86.6%
Holdings187103

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VDC?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and VDC returned +4.6%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or VDC?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so VDC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and VDC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 87% of VDC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against VDC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources