Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs VBR: how they differ
DYNF and VBR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VBR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | VBR |
|---|---|---|
| Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc | 0.04% | 0.24% |
| Omega Healthcare Investors Inc | 0.03% | 0.30% |
| Molina Healthcare Inc | 0.03% | 0.26% |
| Leidos Holdings Inc | 0.03% | 0.28% |
| CACI International Inc | 0.02% | 0.22% |
| API Group Corp | 0.02% | 0.35% |
| Virtu Financial Inc | 0.02% | 0.11% |
| Universal Health Services Inc | 0.02% | 0.16% |
| CH Robinson Worldwide Inc | 0.02% | 0.45% |
| Affiliated Managers Group Inc | 0.02% | 0.18% |
| Tapestry Inc | 0.01% | 0.64% |
| DaVita Inc | 0.01% | 0.15% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in VBR |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 8.62% | Jabil Inc 0.87% |
| Apple Inc 7.75% | Atmos Energy Corp 0.62% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.35% | Williams-Sonoma Inc 0.59% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% | Moderna Inc 0.54% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | Smurfit Westrock PLC 0.52% |
| Broadcom Inc 3.25% | F5 Inc 0.50% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.87% | US Foods Holding Corp 0.48% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 2.76% | JB Hunt Transport Services Inc 0.47% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Vanguard |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Small-Cap Value |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +16.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −1.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.05% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 30.5% |
| Holdings | 187 | 840 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
VBR in plain words
VBR is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 30% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 840 positions, with the top ten at 5.9%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VBR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and VBR returned +16.3%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or VBR?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and VBR charges 0.05%, so VBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and VBR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 30% of VBR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against VBR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-VBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources