Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs VB: how they differ

DYNF and VB hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and VB hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and VB both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFVB
Penumbra Inc0.14%0.14%
Casey's General Stores Inc0.08%0.36%
ATI Inc0.06%0.33%
Woodward Inc0.06%0.31%
SoFi Technologies Inc0.06%0.28%
Insmed Inc0.05%0.14%
Carpenter Technology Corp0.04%0.35%
Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc0.04%0.13%
Omega Healthcare Investors Inc0.03%0.17%
Revolution Medicines Inc0.03%0.46%
Astera Labs Inc0.03%0.45%
MasTec Inc0.03%0.32%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in VB
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55%
Apple Inc 7.75%Jabil Inc 0.49%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%Natera Inc 0.45%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%EMCOR Group Inc 0.45%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%Twilio Inc 0.38%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%MKS Instruments Inc 0.37%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%Flex Ltd 0.36%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%Atmos Energy Corp 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and VB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesVanguard
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveSmall-Cap
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+15.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−2.3 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%21.7%
Holdings1871311

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

VB in plain words

VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or VB?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and VB returned +15.2%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or VB?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against VB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources