Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs SPYG: how they differ
DYNF and SPYG hold 61% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and SPYG hold 61% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.62% | 13.66% |
| Apple Inc | 7.75% | 5.99% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.35% | 7.81% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.42% | 3.48% |
| Broadcom Inc | 3.25% | 5.04% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.87% | 5.91% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.50% | 3.49% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 2.38% | 2.58% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.10% | 4.71% |
| Tesla Inc | 1.74% | 2.07% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 3.59% | 1.68% |
| Lam Research Corp | 2.71% | 1.53% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in SPYG |
|---|---|
| Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93% | KLA Corp 1.11% |
| Duke Energy Corp 1.63% | Mastercard Inc 0.78% |
| Bank of America Corp 1.59% | Arista Networks Inc 0.49% |
| Hartford Insurance Group Inc/The 1.48% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.44% |
| Walmart Inc 1.42% | Amgen Inc 0.38% |
| Travelers Cos Inc/The 1.35% | Coca-Cola Co/The 0.37% |
| Citigroup Inc 1.27% | Marvell Technology Inc 0.34% |
| AT&T Inc 1.03% | Quanta Services Inc 0.30% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | SPYG State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +17.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +0.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 187 | 147 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
SPYG in plain words
SPYG is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 147 positions, with the top ten at 56.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or SPYG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and SPYG returned +17.9%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or SPYG?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and SPYG charges 0.04%, so SPYG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and SPYG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 100% of SPYG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 61% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against SPYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-SPYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources