Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs SPYD: how they differ
DYNF and SPYD hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and SPYD hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | SPYD |
|---|---|---|
| Duke Energy Corp | 1.63% | 1.28% |
| AT&T Inc | 1.03% | 1.06% |
| Realty Income Corp | 0.93% | 1.21% |
| Verizon Communications Inc | 0.87% | 1.30% |
| Exelon Corp | 0.24% | 1.25% |
| Pfizer Inc | 0.24% | 1.12% |
| Comcast Corp | 0.14% | 1.02% |
| CVS Health Corp | 0.12% | 1.53% |
| Huntington Bancshares Inc/OH | 0.02% | 1.14% |
| Eversource Energy | 0.02% | 1.22% |
| Edison International | 0.02% | 1.48% |
| Altria Group Inc | 0.00% | 1.42% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in SPYD |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 8.62% | Iron Mountain Inc 1.62% |
| Apple Inc 7.75% | Franklin Resources Inc 1.57% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.35% | Host Hotels & Resorts Inc 1.53% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% | Target Corp 1.48% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | APA Corp 1.48% |
| Broadcom Inc 3.25% | Viatris Inc 1.46% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.87% | Kimco Realty Corp 1.46% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 2.76% | Simon Property Group Inc 1.45% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | SPYD State Street(R) SPDR(R) Portfolio S&P 500(R) High Dividend ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | State Street |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +12.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −4.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 187 | 78 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
SPYD in plain words
SPYD is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 78 positions, with the top ten at 15.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or SPYD?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and SPYD returned +12.9%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or SPYD?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and SPYD charges 0.07%, so SPYD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and SPYD overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 100% of SPYD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against SPYD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-SPYD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources