Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs RSP: how they differ
DYNF and RSP hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and RSP hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | RSP |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.14% | 0.33% |
| Western Digital Corp | 0.56% | 0.31% |
| GE Vernova Inc | 0.62% | 0.25% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 1.28% | 0.24% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.42% | 0.24% |
| Corning Inc | 0.48% | 0.24% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.35% | 0.24% |
| Broadcom Inc | 3.25% | 0.24% |
| Lam Research Corp | 2.71% | 0.23% |
| Cisco Systems Inc | 2.76% | 0.23% |
| Citigroup Inc | 1.27% | 0.23% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.41% | 0.22% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in RSP |
|---|---|
| Eaton Corp PLC 0.75% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34% |
| Trane Technologies PLC 0.72% | ON Semiconductor Corp. 0.33% |
| Medtronic PLC 0.29% | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 0.29% |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.24% | Centene Corp. 0.29% |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.18% | NXP Semiconductors N.V. 0.28% |
| Penumbra Inc 0.14% | Microchip Technology Inc. 0.27% |
| CRH PLC 0.11% | Humana Inc. 0.27% |
| Bloom Energy Corp 0.10% | QUALCOMM Inc. 0.26% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Invesco |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | S&P 500 equal weight |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +14.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −2.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 99.1% |
| Holdings | 187 | 503 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
RSP in plain words
RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or RSP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and RSP returned +14.8%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or RSP?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against RSP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-RSP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources