Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs RDVY: how they differ
DYNF and RDVY hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and RDVY returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and RDVY hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| Lam Research Corp | 2.71% | 4.42% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.87% | 2.12% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.62% | 1.91% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 3.59% | 1.91% |
| Bank of America Corp | 1.59% | 1.96% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.50% | 1.50% |
| Hartford Insurance Group Inc/The | 1.48% | 1.75% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.35% | 1.45% |
| Apple Inc | 7.75% | 1.44% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.41% | 4.69% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.35% | 1.83% |
| Travelers Cos Inc/The | 1.35% | 2.00% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in RDVY |
|---|---|
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% | KLA CORP 4.14% |
| Broadcom Inc 3.25% | BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP (THE) 2.15% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 2.76% | WILLIAMS SONOMA INC 2.12% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38% | ROSS STORES INC 2.01% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.10% | SNAP-ON INC 2.00% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93% | CHUBB LTD (SWITZERLAND) 1.97% |
| Johnson & Johnson 1.92% | MUELLER INDUSTRIES INC 1.93% |
| Tesla Inc 1.74% | SYNCHRONY FINANCIAL 1.83% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | First Trust |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | First Rising Dividend Achievers |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +22.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +4.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.47% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 94.4% |
| Holdings | 187 | 71 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
RDVY in plain words
RDVY is an index equity fund tracking the First Rising Dividend Achievers. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 71 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or RDVY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and RDVY returned +22.0%, so RDVY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or RDVY?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and RDVY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 94% of RDVY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 26% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against RDVY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-RDVY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources