Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or PULS?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and PULS returned +4.2%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, DYNF or PULS?

DYNF charges 0.26% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs PULS: how they differ

DYNF and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNF	Only in PULS
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%	PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
Apple Inc 7.75%	GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%	Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%	ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%	BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%	FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%	BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%	BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

DYNF and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	PGIM
What it is	U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active	PGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+20.8%	+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+3.3 pts	−13.3 pts
Expense ratio	0.26%	0.15%
Holdings	187	553

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or PULS?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and PULS returned +4.2%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or PULS?: DYNF charges 0.26% a year and PULS charges 0.15%, so PULS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources