Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs MTUM: how they differ
DYNF and MTUM hold 41% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and MTUM hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.62% | 4.65% |
| Broadcom Inc | 3.25% | 5.41% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co | 3.59% | 2.87% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.87% | 2.95% |
| Lam Research Corp | 2.71% | 3.62% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.10% | 2.39% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 1.93% | 3.44% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 1.92% | 3.76% |
| Walmart Inc | 1.42% | 2.76% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 1.41% | 2.36% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.35% | 5.57% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 1.28% | 3.21% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in MTUM |
|---|---|
| Apple Inc 7.75% | KLA CORPORATION 1.61% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.35% | SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMIT 1.51% |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% | ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 1.02% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 2.76% | THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 0.90% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.50% | The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation 0.89% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38% | ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. 0.82% |
| Tesla Inc 1.74% | CUMMINS INC. 0.67% |
| Duke Energy Corp 1.63% | ENTERGY CORPORATION 0.58% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | MSCI USA Momentum Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +21.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 98.2% |
| Holdings | 187 | 125 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
MTUM in plain words
MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or MTUM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or MTUM?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 41% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against MTUM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-MTUM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources