Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DYNF vs MDY: how they differ

DYNF and MDY hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.

iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and MDY hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DYNF and MDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDYNFMDY
Penumbra Inc0.14%0.34%
ATI Inc0.06%0.74%
Woodward Inc0.06%0.70%
Carpenter Technology Corp0.04%0.85%
Omega Healthcare Investors Inc0.03%0.39%
MasTec Inc0.03%0.71%
Halozyme Therapeutics Inc0.03%0.26%
RBC Bearings Inc0.03%0.56%
CACI International Inc0.02%0.28%
Planet Fitness Inc0.02%0.11%
API Group Corp0.02%0.45%
Exelixis Inc0.02%0.38%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DYNFOnly in MDY
NVIDIA Corp 8.62%TWILIO INC 0.86%
Apple Inc 7.75%MKS INC 0.83%
Microsoft Corp 5.35%CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
Amazon.com Inc 4.42%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
Broadcom Inc 3.25%ILLUMINA INC 0.73%
Alphabet Inc 2.87%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%
Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 0.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DYNF and MDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesState Street
What it isU.S. Equity Factor Rotation ActiveS&P MidCap 400, book from IJH
Total return, 1 year+20.8%+13.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+3.3 pts−4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.26%0.23%
Already in the S&P 50098.8%0.0%
Holdings187400

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or MDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and MDY returned +13.0%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DYNF or MDY?
DYNF charges 0.26% a year and MDY charges 0.23%, so MDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DYNF and MDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 0% of MDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DYNF against MDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against MDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-MDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources