Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DYNF vs MAGS: how they differ
DYNF and MAGS hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYNF and MAGS hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYNF | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.62% | 4.15% |
| Apple Inc | 7.75% | 4.12% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 4.42% | 4.11% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.35% | 3.62% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.87% | 2.89% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.50% | 3.59% |
| Tesla Inc | 1.74% | 4.07% |
| Only in DYNF | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| Broadcom Inc 3.25% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| Cisco Systems Inc 2.76% | |
| Lam Research Corp 2.71% | |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38% | |
| Alphabet Inc 2.10% | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93% | |
| Johnson & Johnson 1.92% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | Roundhill |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.8% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.3 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.26% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 98.8% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 187 | 9 |
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DYNF or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DYNF returned +20.8% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DYNF or MAGS?
- DYNF charges 0.26% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DYNF and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 99% of DYNF and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYNF against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DYNF-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources